From the category archives:

Free Ideas

What happens if you have a community of people, an intentional tribe, that doesn’t necessarily sleep at night?

Maybe they’re free-running sleepers, or 28 Hour Day sleepers. Hell, maybe they’re polyphasic. I’m not talking about a controlled environment — I’m talking about an uncontrolled environment, at least in terms of affecting sleep patterns. Can the children grow up being watched by whomever is awake, learning to follow their natural rhythms without being forced to develop sleep patterns that match those of mainstream society (or whoever happens to be in proximity)? Sure, I imagine they’re likely to sleep when some other people are sleeping — but what if they don’t have to?

What would we discover about sleep when it doesn’t have to be attached to daylight or convention? Not where there’s too much or too little daylight, but where because of electricity and technology our patterns and activities are not restricted by it?

Of course, being human also means being an organism that has evolved in a particular combination of light and dark, is accustomed to a certain schedule… But that doesn’t mean that our natural sleep inclinations must follow that strictly, only that we know our patterns can be DISRUPTED by misuse of light and dark. So what does that mean for an intentional community like this?

It’s the kind of experiment I could dream of running, if I knew enough other people interested in sleep experiments — and I admit that going so far as to run the experiment in an environment with growing children is pretty hardcore. I think we’d all want to be pretty sure it wasn’t going to mess everyone up before we subjected our children to it from their moment of birth, you know?

Does this mean it’s an implausible experiment?

Probably not.

In fact, all it needs are the right people and the right circumstances. But it would probably have to happen by itself — not solely as a result of some science-minded explorer just wanting to know. Even if that explorer is me. ;}

Still, I’m pretty interested in communities that raise children (as opposed to isolated single family units, for instance). And I’m just mad for sleep experiments.

iPhone Ball Pit

by Megan M. on December 25, 2009

Why on earth is there no “ball pit” app for the iPhone? We searched and searched, but found nothing.

I guess we’ll just need to built a real one. But still… I’d pay money, app developers. I really think I would. Let’s think about this just for a moment, shall we?

[click to continue…]

Where is your happiness?

by Megan M. on December 24, 2009

This morning while searching for something to listen to while I showered, I stumbled on a TED Talk by Martin Seligman, the author of a book called Learned Optimism that I’d been looking at fairly recently. I thought, hmm, why not? And I put it on. (There’s a sidenote here about the sheer glee it gives me to stream TED Talks from the internet through my iPhone without having to do anything more than download an itsy bitty app — but I’ll save that for later. It’s bound to last, so it’s not like it will be old news in a month or two.)

In this talk, Seligman is talking about three kinds of happiness and how they work in human beings: A pleasurable happiness, where you have good feelings and good things happen to you. A “flow” happiness, where you are engaged with your environment in a productive way. And a meaning happiness, where something you are doing or involved with has a higher meaning that drives you. I don’t know if he’s written a book that focuses more on the material in this talk, but man, it blew me away. It was all I could do to keep soaping up, because I kept forgetting that I was supposed to be getting done with my shower and back to all the other stuff I had to do today.

What this imprinted on me was something I’ve been noodling with for a long time; happiness is not necessarily made of leisure, and it doesn’t have to only be made of meaning — it can be made of engagement of self, something that I’ve always found intensely rewarding and enjoyable, and often wondered, in passing, if there was something wrong with me. Meaning is the most powerful part of any pursuit, and pleasure is pleasurable, but engagement is no can of beans — in fact, Seligman says that in terms of producing significant, lasting happiness, meaning is first and engagement is second. Pleasure produces happiness, but it just doesn’t hold a candle to the other two in terms of effect and results. This fascinates the hell out of me, as it ought to, since I get a lot of flack for not relaxing enough.

Not to say that I shouldn’t relax more — I should. We need balance. Our brains need recharge time. But still, interesting, right? My happiness is primarily in meaning and engagement, like he says, though engagement for me is the thrill of the chase — I sometimes think it’s more important to me than meaning, but of course that’s not true, since the only things that truly engage me are the ones that have great meaning to me. It’s just that the meaning is not always the most overt part of the equation.

Where’s your happiness at?